
Last reviewed: 24 October 2026. Enhanced due diligence (EDD) is the extra work the Money Laundering Regulations 2017 (MLRs) require when a client or transaction carries a higher risk of money laundering. Two of the triggers changed on 30 June 2026. This guide sets out when EDD applies now, what to collect for each trigger and a checklist you can use on the file.
Enhanced due diligence in five points
- Reg 33(1) sets the mandatory cases. High risk in your risk assessment, FATF call for action countries, politically exposed persons (PEPs), false or stolen ID, unusual transactions and any other higher-risk case.
- The country trigger is narrower since 30 June 2026. It now covers only FATF call for action countries: North Korea, Iran and Myanmar on the June 2026 list. Grey-list countries are a risk factor, not an automatic trigger.
- Schedule 3ZA no longer exists. It was omitted on 23 January 2024. Do not cite it.
- Call for action cases need source of funds and source of wealth. Reg 33(3A) also requires senior management approval and enhanced monitoring.
- PEP EDD is proportionate. A domestic PEP starts as lower risk (reg 35(3A)), and FCA guidance FG25/3 explains how to scale the checks.
When EDD is mandatory: the reg 33(1) triggers
EDD and enhanced ongoing monitoring are mandatory in seven cases listed in reg 33(1). Your client risk assessment should screen every new client against each of them and record the answer. If none applies, your own risk assessment can still lead you to EDD.
| Reg 33(1) | Trigger |
|---|---|
| (a) | You identify a high risk in your firm-wide risk assessment, or your supervisor’s information points to one |
| (b) | A business relationship with a person established in a FATF call for action country, or a relevant transaction where either party is established there |
| (c) | Correspondent relationships (banks and financial institutions only) |
| (d) | The client or potential client is a PEP, or a family member or known close associate of a PEP |
| (e) | The client has given false or stolen ID documents or information and you propose to continue |
| (f) | A transaction is unusually complex or unusually large in each case given its nature; there is an unusual pattern of transactions; or there is no apparent economic or legal purpose |
| (g) | Any other case which by its nature can present a higher risk |
“Established in” a country means, for an individual, being resident there, “but not merely having been born in that country”. For a company, it means incorporated there or having its principal place of business there (reg 33(3)(c)).
What changed on 30 June 2026, and what happened to Schedule 3ZA
SI 2026/621 reg 19 made two changes to reg 33(1) from 30 June 2026. The country trigger now applies only to FATF call for action countries. The transaction trigger now reads “unusually complex or unusually large in each case given the nature of the transaction”. The PEP and other triggers did not change.
How the country trigger has moved:
| Period | Countries that triggered mandatory EDD |
|---|---|
| Until 22 January 2024 | The list in Schedule 3ZA of the MLRs |
| 23 January 2024 to 29 June 2026 | FATF call for action list and FATF increased monitoring (grey) list (SI 2024/69) |
| From 30 June 2026 | FATF call for action list only |
On the FATF list published on 19 June 2026, as reproduced by HM Treasury on 22 June 2026, the call for action countries are North Korea, Iran and Myanmar. The grey list has 22 jurisdictions, including the British Virgin Islands and Monaco. FATF updates both lists after each plenary in February, June and October. As at 24 October 2026, the October 2026 update had not been published, so check the HM Treasury advisory notice again after it.
Grey-list links still matter. HM Treasury says firms must take FATF evaluations into account as a geographical risk factor under reg 33(6)(c) and apply EDD where they identify a high risk. Two warnings: the opening section of HM Treasury’s notice still uses the pre-2026 definition, and LSAG 2025 §6.19.1 predates the change. The law as amended is what counts. Our MLR 2026 changes guide covers the wider amendments.
What to collect for each trigger
The law sets the minimum measures; guidance suggests the evidence. Choose the evidence in proportion to the risk, and record why it satisfied you. “It is not enough to know the money came from a UK bank account,” as HMRC puts it in AMLG11630. Reg 33(5) lists optional measures you can add in any case.
| Trigger | What you must do | Typical evidence |
|---|---|---|
| High risk in your assessment (a) | EDD and enhanced monitoring, using reg 33(5) measures | Extra identity and address verification from independent sources; the client’s ownership and financial background; source of funds evidence; a file note of your reasoning |
| FATF call for action country (b) | All of reg 33(3A)(a)–(f) | See the next section |
| PEP, family member or close associate (d) | Reg 35(5): senior management approval, adequate measures to establish source of wealth and source of funds, enhanced ongoing monitoring | Screening result; the client’s own declaration; source of wealth and funds evidence in proportion to the risk; the approval record |
| False or stolen ID and you continue (e) | EDD; HMRC says you should immediately consider reporting | Nominated officer’s record; the suspicious activity report (SAR), or the reasons for not making one |
| Unusual transaction (f) | Reg 33(4): examine the background and purpose as far as reasonably possible; increase monitoring | The client’s written explanation, corroborating documents, a file note |
| Any other higher-risk case (g) | EDD using reg 33(5) measures | Depends on the risk: for example a grey-list link, a complex structure, a third-party payer or adverse media |
HMRC’s AMLG11600 adds practical measures: certified copies, validating documents against an authoritative source, checking for known fraud and requiring payment from an account in the client’s name. Our guide to source of funds vs source of wealth lists acceptable documents.
FATF call for action countries: the reg 33(3A) measures
Where a client or a party to a relevant transaction is established in a call for action country, reg 33(3A) is not optional. You must apply all six measures, including source of funds and source of wealth for both the client and the beneficial owner. A branch or majority-owned subsidiary of a group under equivalent supervision may be exempt (reg 33(2)).
- Additional information on the client and the beneficial owner.
- Additional information on the intended nature of the business relationship.
- Information on the source of funds and source of wealth of the client and the beneficial owner.
- The reasons for the transactions.
- Senior management approval to establish or continue the relationship.
- Enhanced monitoring: more controls, applied more often, with selected transaction patterns examined.
HMRC’s AMLG11640 expects source of funds to be “supported by evidence”. Its bullet on source of funds does not mention source of wealth, but the regulation requires both, so collect both. All three countries on the June 2026 list are also under UK financial sanctions, according to HM Treasury, so check the UK Sanctions List as well.
PEPs: EDD in proportion (FCA FG25/3)
Every PEP, family member and known close associate needs EDD, but not the same EDD. Reg 35(3A) says a domestic PEP starts as lower risk than a non-domestic PEP. FCA guidance FG25/3 (July 2025, replacing FG17/6) says domestic PEPs should be treated as lower risk unless other factors point higher.
- Identify PEPs among clients and beneficial owners. Reg 35(1) requires systems for both. HMRC suggests asking the client, public sources or a commercial provider, and understanding how that provider’s database is populated.
- Know who is not a PEP. HMRC says UK local councillors are not PEPs, and UK civil servants below Permanent or Deputy Permanent Secretary are not normally PEPs. FG25/3 adds non-executive board members of UK civil service departments.
- Scale the sign-off. FG25/3 says senior management approval for a lower-risk PEP may come from a lower level of seniority.
- Former PEPs stay in scope for at least 12 months after leaving office (reg 35(9)).
- Do not refuse a client just for being a PEP. CCAB guidance discourages it.
Late identification is costly: the SRA’s 2025-26 report describes a former licensed body fined £172,934 after it identified the beneficial owner of a client company as a non-domestic PEP only two months after the purchase completed. More in our guide to PEPs, sanctions and adverse media.
Complex or unusual transactions
Since 30 June 2026 the test is whether a transaction is “unusually complex or unusually large in each case given the nature of the transaction”. A large house purchase is not unusual for an estate agent; a large cash deposit with no clear source may be. Measure against what is normal for that kind of work and that client.
Reg 33(4) then requires you to examine the background and purpose as far as reasonably possible and to increase monitoring to see whether the transaction appears suspicious. Ask the client, corroborate the answer and write a file note. If something still does not add up, pass it to your nominated officer to decide on a SAR.
Sector notes
The triggers are the same for every regulated firm, but each sector’s guidance highlights different cases. These points from HMRC, LSAG and CCAB guidance are the ones most likely to lead a small firm to EDD.
- Estate agents. HMRC says both buyer and seller are customers and that for a PEP or call for action customer you must verify source of wealth and source of funds. Treat super-prime transactions as high risk (£5m or more in London and the South East, £1m or more elsewhere) and take extra care with cash buyers. See the estate agents hub.
- Letting agents. In scope at £10,000 a month or more. HMRC flags high-net-worth clients, PEPs, complex structures and rent paid to offshore accounts without knowing the beneficial owner. See the letting agents hub.
- Accountants. CCAB guidance says firms must refer to the call for action list for mandatory EDD and should also use the grey list, Transparency International and FATF evaluations. See the accountants hub.
- Solicitors. LSAG says you need not account for every asset when establishing source of wealth, but you should build a rationale; if you cannot establish it in a higher-risk case, consider ceasing to act and reporting. Remember that LSAG’s country section predates 30 June 2026. See the solicitors hub.
- Financial advisers. Use FCA FG25/3 for PEPs. See the financial advisers hub.
Not sure who supervises you? Use our AML supervisor finder.
When you cannot complete EDD
If you cannot complete the due diligence you need, reg 31 says you must not carry out the transaction or start the relationship, must end an existing one and must consider making a SAR. If you decide not to report, HMRC expects you to record why.
EDD checklist
- Screen the client, beneficial owners and other parties against each reg 33(1) trigger and record yes or no.
- Check the FATF call for action list currently in force, and record the date of the version you used.
- Run PEP, sanctions and adverse media screening, and keep the results.
- For a PEP, record the type (domestic or non-domestic, family, close associate) and your risk view under reg 35(3A).
- Collect source of funds evidence, and source of wealth evidence where required (PEPs, call for action cases) or where the risk calls for it.
- For unusual transactions, get the client’s explanation, corroborate it and write a file note.
- Get senior management approval where reg 33(3A) or reg 35(5) requires it, and record who approved and when.
- Set enhanced ongoing monitoring: what you will check, how often and who is responsible.
- If you cannot complete EDD, stop, and refer the case to your nominated officer.
- Keep everything for 5 years from the end of the relationship (reg 40).
AML Buddy can help with step 3: your client verifies their identity through one secure link, and you get sanctions, PEP and adverse media screening in a timestamped report for the file, at £5.40 a check inc. VAT. The EDD decisions and evidence beyond that stay with your firm.
Download our free CDD checklist and client risk assessment form, and take the 2-minute AML health check to see where your firm stands. For the standard checks that come first, read our guide to customer due diligence.
This guide is general information, not legal advice. Your supervisor’s guidance and your own risk assessment decide what is right for your firm.
Frequently asked questions
When is enhanced due diligence required in the UK?
Regulation 33(1) of the Money Laundering Regulations requires EDD and enhanced ongoing monitoring where your risk assessment or your supervisor identifies a high risk, where a FATF call for action country is involved, for PEPs and their family members and known close associates, where false or stolen ID is used and you continue, for unusually complex or unusually large transactions, unusual patterns or no apparent purpose, and in any other case that by its nature presents a higher risk.
What changed for EDD in 2026?
From 30 June 2026, SI 2026/621 narrowed two triggers. The country trigger now covers only FATF call for action countries, not the FATF increased monitoring (grey) list. The transaction trigger now reads 'unusually complex or unusually large in each case given the nature of the transaction'. The PEP and other triggers did not change.
Which countries are FATF call for action countries?
On the list published by FATF on 19 June 2026, as reproduced by HM Treasury on 22 June 2026: North Korea (the Democratic People's Republic of Korea), Iran and Myanmar. FATF updates its lists after each plenary in February, June and October, so check the list again after every update.
Is Schedule 3ZA still the list of high-risk countries?
No. Schedule 3ZA was omitted from the Money Laundering Regulations on 23 January 2024 by SI 2024/69, which replaced it with a direct reference to the FATF lists. There is no current Schedule 3ZA list, so do not rely on it.
Do grey-list countries still need EDD?
Not automatically since 30 June 2026. HM Treasury says you must still take FATF evaluations into account as a geographical risk factor under regulation 33(6)(c), and apply EDD where you identify a high risk. In practice, a grey-list link is a factor in your client risk assessment that can lead to EDD.
Do UK PEPs always need enhanced due diligence?
Yes, EDD applies to every PEP, but it should be proportionate. Regulation 35(3A) says a domestic PEP starts as lower risk than a non-domestic PEP, and with no other risk factors the EDD can be less extensive. FCA guidance FG25/3 adds that senior management sign-off for a lower-risk PEP may be given at a lower level of seniority.
What is the difference between CDD and EDD?
Customer due diligence is the standard set of checks for every client: identify and verify them, understand the purpose of the work and monitor the relationship. Enhanced due diligence adds measures for higher-risk cases, such as more information from independent sources, source of funds and source of wealth checks, senior management approval and closer monitoring.
How long must I keep EDD records?
Regulation 40 covers EDD and PEP records as well as standard CDD. Keep them for 5 years from the end of the business relationship or the completion of an occasional transaction, then delete personal data unless an exception applies.
Sources
- Money Laundering Regulations 2017, regulation 28 (customer due diligence measures)
- Money Laundering Regulations 2017, regulation 31 (requirement to cease transactions)
- Money Laundering Regulations 2017, regulation 33 (enhanced due diligence)
- Money Laundering Regulations 2017, regulation 35 (politically exposed persons)
- Money Laundering Regulations 2017, regulation 40 (record keeping)
- Money Laundering Regulations 2017, Schedule 3ZA (omitted)
- SI 2024/69, regulation 2 (high-risk third countries replaced by the FATF lists)
- SI 2026/621, regulation 19 (amendments to regulation 33, in force 30 June 2026)
- HM Treasury: Money laundering advisory notice, high-risk third countries (updated 22 June 2026)
- HMRC AMLG11600: Enhanced due diligence
- HMRC AMLG11630: Source of funds and source of wealth
- HMRC AMLG11640: FATF call for action countries
- HMRC AMLG11650: Politically exposed persons
- HMRC AMLG11700: Record keeping
- HMRC AMLG2200: Estate agent business guidance
- HMRC AMLG3200: Estate agency business risk assessment
- HMRC AMLG3300: Letting agency business risk assessment
- FCA FG25/3: The treatment of politically exposed persons for anti-money laundering purposes
- Legal Sector Affinity Group: AML guidance for the legal sector 2025, sections 6.18 and 6.19
- CCAB: Anti-money laundering guidance for the accountancy sector (July 2026), sections 4.6.17 and 5.3
- SRA: Anti-money laundering annual report 2025-26
Cite this page
Free to quote with a link. Please cite the original source too where we name one.
AML Buddy (2026) Enhanced due diligence (EDD) checklist for UK firms: when it applies and what to collect. Updated 24 October 2026. Available at: https://www.amlbuddy.com/resources/enhanced-due-diligence-checklist

